Tokenized Treasuries Market Cap Tracker: TVL Growth

BH

03 Apr 2026 (14 days ago)

18 min read

Share:

Track tokenized treasuries market cap growth from $100M in 2023 to $11.92B in 2026, with TVL data, protocol comparisons, and live tracker resources.

Tokenized Treasuries Market Cap Tracker: TVL Growth

Introduction

Tokenized treasuries are blockchain tokens backed 1:1 by US Treasury bills, notes, or bonds held by a regulated custodian. Issuers purchase government securities and use smart contracts to record ownership and distribute yield automatically. These products represent the largest asset class within real-world asset tokenization (RWA tokenization), where traditional financial instruments convert to on-chain formats.

The on-chain treasury market cap exceeded $11 billion as of 18 March 2026. Total value locked (TVL) measures the dollar value of bonds deposited into protocols. This article tracks TVL growth, compares protocols, and explains methodologies, risks, and regulations. Readers gain access to data tables and live tracking resources.

Key platforms include RWA.xyz and DeFiLlama, which calculate TVL through on-chain token supply multiplied by oracle prices or issuer-reported net asset value (NAV). Institutional products dominate, with access restricted to accredited investors or qualified purchasers.

Key Takeaways

  • Five protocols hold the largest tokenized treasury TVL as of March 2026: Circle USYC, BlackRock BUIDL, Ondo OUSG, Franklin Templeton BENJI, and Ondo USDY.
  • Ethereum dominates RWA TVL with approximately 57% share as of 17 March 2026.
  • On-chain treasury market cap grew from under $200 million in early 2023 to $11.92 billion as of 18 March 2026.
  • Smart contracts automate yield distribution through rebasing or price appreciation models.
  • Existing securities laws apply to tokenized treasuries in the US, EU, Singapore, UAE, and Switzerland as of Q1 2026.

What are tokenized treasuries and how do they represent on-chain government bonds?

Tokens backed by US government debt

A tokenized treasury is a blockchain token backed 1:1 by a US Treasury bill, note, or bond held by a regulated custodian. The issuer purchases the underlying government securities through licensed channels and deposits them with a qualified custodian. That custodian keeps the bonds separate from the issuer's own funds, which protects token holders if the issuer faces financial difficulties.

Issuers use smart contracts — self-executing programs on the blockchain — to record ownership and distribute yield to token holders automatically. Two distribution models are common: rebasing, where the holder's token balance increases to reflect earned interest, and price appreciation, where the token's value rises daily as yield accrues. For example, Ondo Finance's USDY uses the rebasing model, while Superstate's USTB uses price appreciation.

Real-world asset tokenization (RWA tokenization) is the broader process of representing traditional financial assets as on-chain tokens. Tokenized US Treasuries are the largest single asset class within RWA tokenization, having driven the initial wave of institutional adoption on-chain.

Tokenized treasuries vs. stablecoins and TVL defined

Tokenized treasuries differ fundamentally from stablecoins despite both being dollar-denominated digital tokens. A stablecoin maintains a fixed $1 peg and does not pass yield to the holder. A tokenized treasury, by contrast, passes through the yield of the underlying T-bill — typically 4–5% annualised as of mid-2025 — directly to the token holder.

Total value locked (TVL) in the RWA context measures the dollar value of government bonds deposited into on-chain protocols and tracked by their token supply. This figure reflects how much off-chain capital institutions and investors have committed to tokenized treasury products at any given time.

How do leading tokenized treasury protocols compare in TVL, yield, and investor access?

Metrics and access tiers across the top five protocols

Five protocols held the largest share of the tokenized treasury market by TVL as of March 2026: Circle's USYC, BlackRock BUIDL, Ondo Finance OUSG, Franklin Templeton BENJI, and Ondo Finance USDY. Each protocol differs across three key dimensions: the dollar value of bonds deposited (TVL), the annualised yield passed to token holders, and the category of investor permitted to subscribe. Understanding these dimensions together is essential because a product with high TVL may still be inaccessible to most investors due to regulatory access requirements.

Investor access requirements vary significantly across protocols. An accredited investor is a US regulatory classification requiring either a net worth above $1 million (excluding primary residence) or annual income above $200,000. A qualified purchaser is a stricter threshold, requiring at least $5 million in investments. Ondo Finance's USDY is structured as a permissionless token available to non-US investors without a qualified purchaser requirement, making it the most broadly accessible product in the group. Circle's USYC is accessible to non-US institutions with a minimum investment of $100,000.

USYC — Circle

TVL: ~$2.3B

Yield: ~4.3% APY

Chain: Ethereum

Access: Non-US institutions; $100K min

Regulatory: Reg D exempt

BUIDL — BlackRock

TVL: ~$2.4B

Yield: ~4.5% APY

Chain: Ethereum, Polygon, Aptos, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism

Access: Qualified purchaser ($5M min)

Regulatory: SEC-registered fund

OUSG — Ondo Finance

TVL: ~$720M

Yield: ~3.9% (30D APY)

Chain: Ethereum, Solana

Access: US qualified purchaser

Regulatory: Reg D private fund

BENJI — Franklin Templeton

TVL: ~$780M

Yield: ~4.0% APY

Chain: Stellar, Polygon, Ethereum, Avalanche, Base, VeChain

Access: Accredited investor

Regulatory: SEC-registered fund (FOBXX)

USDY — Ondo Finance

TVL: ~$500M+

Yield: ~4.3% APY

Chain: Ethereum, Solana, Sei, Mantle, and others

Access: Non-US non-accredited investors

Regulatory: Structured note

Source: Protocol documentation and issuer reports. Data current as of March 2026.

The table illustrates a clear split between institutional-only products (BUIDL, OUSG) and more broadly distributed ones (USDY, BENJI). BlackRock BUIDL requires investors to meet the qualified purchaser standard and engage through Securitize, BUIDL's transfer agent and distribution platform. Franklin Templeton's BENJI, issued through the FOBXX registered fund, accepts accredited investors and distributes tokens via the Benji Investments app, reaching a wider investor base than BUIDL.

How does the tokenized treasury TVL tracking methodology work on RWA.xyz and DeFiLlama?

How RWA.xyz calculates tokenized treasury market cap

RWA.xyz is the primary data platform for tracking tokenized real-world asset market cap, covering over 400 tokenized assets as of March 2026. For tokenized treasury products, the platform derives market cap by multiplying a protocol's on-chain token supply by the token's net asset value (NAV) as reported by the issuer. This figure is commonly labelled "market cap" on RWA.xyz, though in most RWA contexts the terms market cap and TVL are used interchangeably to mean the same thing: the dollar value of bonds backing the circulating token supply.

RWA.xyz introduced a new asset classification framework in March 2026 that divides tokenized assets into two categories: Distributed Assets and Represented Assets. Distributed Assets can be transferred between wallets outside the issuing platform; Represented Assets cannot, as they serve primarily as an internal recordkeeping layer. This reclassification means RWA.xyz's headline tokenized treasury figures reflect only freely transferable tokens by default, so a platform's total may appear lower than the full issued supply.

How DeFiLlama tracks RWA TVL and where the two platforms differ

DeFiLlama calculates TVL for its RWA category using two methods depending on the product. For tokens with active on-chain price feeds, it uses token supply multiplied by the oracle price. For products without liquid secondary markets — the majority of tokenized treasury tokens — DeFiLlama relies on NAV data reported periodically by the issuer or custodian.

This reliance on issuer-reported NAV creates a risk of stale data: if a custodian updates NAV weekly rather than daily, the displayed TVL figure may lag the true underlying value. DeFiLlama's RWA category and RWA.xyz also differ in scope: DeFiLlama aggregates tokenized treasuries within its broader RWA category alongside private credit and tokenized commodities, while RWA.xyz offers dedicated filtering by asset class and chain. Analysts tracking on-chain treasury market cap should cross-reference both platforms and note each figure's update timestamp before drawing conclusions.

How has the tokenized treasuries market cap grown from 2023 to 2026?

Early growth drivers: 2021 to 2023

Franklin Templeton launched the first tokenized money market fund, BENJI (FOBXX), on the Stellar blockchain in April 2021, establishing the first on-chain record of US Treasury fund ownership. By early 2023, the total on-chain treasury market cap remained below $200 million, as institutional adoption had not yet reached scale. Ondo Finance launched OUSG in January 2023, targeting DeFi protocols seeking T-bill yield as a collateral asset, and helped push total market cap past $500 million by year-end 2023.

The 2024–2026 acceleration

BlackRock's launch of BUIDL on Ethereum in March 2024 marked a turning point for the entire sector. BUIDL reached $500 million in assets under management by July 2024, becoming the first tokenized treasury product to hit that milestone, and the broader market crossed $1 billion for the first time in May 2024. By January 2025, total market cap stood near $4 billion, before accelerating sharply through mid-2025 as institutional demand for on-chain yield intensified. The market crossed $10 billion on 22 January 2026 and exceeded $11 billion by 2 March 2026, according to RWA.xyz. As of 18 March 2026, the tokenized US Treasury market cap stood at approximately $11.92 billion, reflecting 27% year-to-date growth in Q1 2026 alone.

DateTotal Market CapQoQ GrowthKey MilestoneTop Protocol at Time
Q1 2023~$100MOndo OUSG launches Jan 2023Franklin Templeton BENJI
Q2 2023~$300M~200%DeFi protocol integrations accelerateFranklin Templeton BENJI
Q4 2023~$780M~160%Total market nears $1B for first timeFranklin Templeton BENJI
Q2 2024~$1.8B~131%BlackRock BUIDL launches Mar 2024; market doubles H1 2024BlackRock BUIDL
Q3 2024~$2.2B~22%BUIDL surpasses $500M AUMBlackRock BUIDL
Q1 2025~$4.0B~82%Multi-chain BUIDL expansion; Solana share class launches Mar 2025BlackRock BUIDL
Q3 2025~$6.5B~63%Total on-chain RWA exceeds $10B across all asset classesBlackRock BUIDL
Q1 2026~$11.92B~83%Market crosses $10B on 22 Jan 2026; $11B by 2 Mar 2026Circle USYC

Q1 2023

~$100M — OUSG launches

Q4 2023

~$780M — Near $1B milestone

Q2 2024

~$1.8B — BUIDL launches

Q1 2025

~$4.0B — Multi-chain expansion

Q3 2025

~$6.5B — RWA total $10B+

Q1 2026

~$11.92B — USYC leads

PeriodGrowth ScaleMarket Cap
Q1 2026
 
~$11.92B
Q3 2025
 
~$6.5B
Q1 2025
 
~$4.0B
Q3 2024
 
~$2.2B
Q2 2024
 
~$1.8B
Q4 2023
 
~$780M
Q2 2023
 
~$300M
Q1 2023
 
~$100M

Source: RWA.xyz historical data; protocol announcements. Data current as of March 2026.

The Q1 2026 acceleration partly reflects Circle USYC's rapid expansion, driven by Binance's adoption of USYC as off-exchange collateral for institutional derivatives trading on BNB Chain. In the first two months of 2026, tokenized treasuries added $2.12 billion in market cap — outpacing stablecoin supply growth of $1.19 billion in the same period for the first time on record.

What are the primary use cases for tokenized treasuries in DeFi and institutional portfolios?

DeFi collateral: earning yield while accessing liquidity

Tokenized treasuries serve as productive collateral in DeFi lending protocols — assets that generate yield while simultaneously securing a loan. VanEck's VBILL fund was integrated into Aave Horizon in November 2025, allowing institutions to deposit VBILL as collateral and borrow stablecoins against it without selling their Treasury position. Pricing for VBILL on Aave Horizon relies on Chainlink's NAVLink oracle, which feeds the token's net asset value on-chain for real-time loan-to-value calculations. BlackRock's BUIDL was accepted as collateral by Binance for institutional derivatives trading in November 2025, enabling clients to post Treasury-backed assets instead of idle cash.

DAO treasury management: replacing idle stablecoin holdings

A decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO) is a community-governed protocol that manages on-chain assets through token holder votes. Many DAOs historically held idle treasuries in USDC or ETH, earning no yield on dormant capital. In June 2024, the Arbitrum STEP Committee recommended allocating $27 million from the Arbitrum DAO treasury across six tokenized treasury products, including Ondo USDY, BlackRock BUIDL, and Superstate USTB. This shift allows DAOs to generate T-bill yield on idle reserves while retaining the on-chain composability and 24/7 liquidity that stablecoins provide.

Institutional cash management: faster settlement and on-chain liquidity

Traditional corporate treasury operations rely on money market funds that settle on a T+1 basis during banking hours. Tokenized treasury products settle on-chain at any time of day, including weekends and public holidays, removing the lag between a redemption request and capital availability. The DTCC announced in December 2025 that it would tokenize US Treasury securities on the Canton Network, signalling that post-trade infrastructure for tokenized bonds is moving toward regulated, large-scale deployment. Banks and asset managers tracking these developments note that programmable settlement — where smart contracts automatically redirect yield and principal at maturity — reduces manual reconciliation costs compared to traditional custodian workflows.

What blockchain networks host the most tokenized treasury TVL and why?

Ethereum's dominant position and the logic behind it

Ethereum holds approximately 57% of the distributed on-chain RWA market as of 17 March 2026, with roughly $15.5 billion in tokenized assets across all RWA categories. For tokenized treasuries specifically, Ethereum's dominance reflects three structural advantages: broad EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) compatibility with DeFi protocols, established custodian and oracle infrastructure, and institutional familiarity with Ethereum as a settlement layer. Products requiring DeFi composability — such as BUIDL used as Aave Horizon collateral or OUSG integrated into Morpho Blue — deploy on Ethereum precisely because the deepest liquidity pools and lending markets reside there.

BNB Chain has grown to approximately $3 billion in total RWA TVL as of March 2026, driven primarily by Binance's adoption of USYC and BENJI as institutional collateral assets on its exchange platform.

Challengers: Stellar, Solana, and Base

Stellar was purpose-built for low-cost asset issuance and cross-border settlement, processing transactions in 3–5 seconds at fractions of a cent per transaction. Franklin Templeton's BENJI launched on Stellar in April 2021 and Stellar still holds over 63% of BENJI's total AUM, making it the dominant chain for that specific product. Stellar's overall RWA TVL reached approximately $1.5 billion as of early 2026, with tokenized US Treasuries comprising 94.8% of its total RWA market.

Solana's RWA market cap hit an all-time high of $1.71 billion in late February 2026, reflecting a 45% increase over the prior 30-day period. Solana's throughput of over 4,000 transactions per second at fees near $0.00025 per transaction attracts protocols prioritising high-frequency settlement and retail-accessible products such as Ondo USDY. Base, Coinbase's Ethereum Layer-2 network, hosts BENJI and Franklin Templeton has expanded BENJI's multi-chain deployment across Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, Base, and VeChain.

BlockchainRWA TVL (March 2026)% of TotalKey Protocols HostedSettlement Speed
Ethereum~$15.5B (all RWA)~57%BUIDL, OUSG, USYC, BENJI (partial)~12 seconds
BNB Chain~$3.0B~11%USYC, BENJI (collateral)~3 seconds
Stellar~$1.5B~6%BENJI (63% of BENJI AUM)3–5 seconds
Solana~$1.71B~6%USDY, BUIDL (share class)<1 second
BaseData gap as of March 2026BENJI (partial)~2 seconds
OtherRemainderWisdomTree, Superstate, multi-chain productsVaries
BlockchainTVL ShareRWA TVL
Ethereum
 
~$15.5B
BNB Chain
 
~$3.0B
Solana
 
~$1.71B
Stellar
 
~$1.5B
Base / Other
 
Remainder

Source: RWA.xyz chain analytics. Data current as of March 2026.

The data shows that no single challenger has yet displaced Ethereum's lead, but the multi-chain deployment pattern is clear. Each major issuer now deploys on at least three blockchains, and products such as BUIDL span six networks. This fragmentation increases total market reach but also means TVL figures on any single chain understate a protocol's true aggregate scale.

What risks should investors consider when using tokenized treasury products?

Smart contract risk and custodian risk

A smart contract is a self-executing program deployed on a blockchain that automates token transfers, yield distribution, and access controls. If the contract contains a logic flaw — such as an incorrect yield calculation or a broken collateralisation rule — an attacker can exploit it without requiring physical access to any system. In 2024, logic errors were the second most costly attack vector in DeFi, generating $63.8 million in documented losses. Tokenized treasury issuers commission independent security audits before deployment, but immutable code means that once a contract is live, errors cannot be corrected without pre-planned upgrade mechanisms.

Custodian risk refers to the danger that the off-chain institution holding the underlying Treasury securities fails or misappropriates the bonds. A tokenized treasury token is a digital claim on bonds held by a regulated custodian — the token's value depends entirely on that custodian's solvency and operational integrity. The IOSCO's 2025 report on tokenization of financial assets identified custodian arrangements as a unique risk category in tokenized products, distinct from the risks in traditional fund structures.

Liquidity risk and compliance portability risk

Tokenized treasuries do not trade on deep secondary markets in the way that stablecoins or listed equities do. Most products offer liquidity only through direct redemption with the issuer, which may operate within defined windows — typically one to five business days — rather than instantly. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York noted in September 2025 that secondary market development for tokenized fund shares remains limited, and that price shocks in secondary markets unrelated to the underlying bonds could pressure token holders to redeem early, amplifying stress.

KYC whitelisting is a compliance mechanism built into token smart contracts that restricts transfers to pre-approved, identity-verified wallet addresses. This design enforces regulatory compliance automatically but creates a compliance portability problem: an investor whitelisted for one tokenized fund must complete a separate KYC process for every other issuer's product, even when using the same identity provider. Each issuer currently maintains its own identity registry, so holding multiple tokenized treasury products across issuers multiplies onboarding friction and limits how freely tokens can move between counterparties.

What regulatory frameworks apply to tokenized treasuries across key jurisdictions?

The US framework: existing securities law applied to tokenized products

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a joint statement on 28 January 2026 clarifying that tokenized securities remain subject to the same federal securities laws as their traditional counterparts. The SEC's position rests on substance over form: the blockchain format does not alter registration requirements, disclosure obligations, or custody standards. Tokenized treasury funds structured as registered investment funds — such as BlackRock BUIDL and Franklin Templeton BENJI — operate under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Products issued without full registration, such as Ondo OUSG, use Regulation D or Regulation S exemptions, which restrict sales to accredited investors or limit distribution to non-US persons respectively.

On 12 March 2026, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated that the Commission expects to consider an innovation exemption to facilitate limited trading of tokenized securities, signalling movement toward a dedicated long-term regulatory framework. No such framework was enacted as of Q1 2026 — existing securities law still governs all tokenized treasury products in the US.

Regulatory Framework by Jurisdiction (Q1 2026)
United States

Status: Active — existing securities law applies

Key Rule: Investment Company Act 1940; Reg D / Reg S exemptions

Access: Qualified purchaser or accredited investor

Updated: January 2026

European Union

Status: MiCA fully operational; tokenized securities under MiFID II

Key Rule: MiCA Title V; MiFID II for fund shares

Access: Varies by product type; no single EU-wide retail restriction

Updated: December 2024

Singapore

Status: Active — substance-based regulation under SFA

Key Rule: Securities and Futures Act 2001; MAS revised Guide on Tokenisation Dec 2025

Access: Capital markets services licence required for intermediaries

Updated: December 2025

UAE (ADGM / DIFC)

Status: Active — free zone frameworks permit tokenized securities

Key Rule: ADGM Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA); DIFC Markets Law

Access: Institutional and professional investors; retail access restricted

Updated: 2025

Switzerland

Status: Active — DLT Act in force since 2021

Key Rule: Federal Act on the Adaptation of Federal Law to Developments in DLT (DLT Act)

Access: Qualified investors; FINMA oversight of issuers

Updated: 2021 (static)

Source: SEC, MAS, ADGM, FINMA official publications and IOSCO reports. Data current as of Q1 2026.

No jurisdiction had enacted tokenized-treasury-specific legislation as of Q1 2026. Each market applies its existing securities or funds law to tokenized products, relying on the principle that economic substance — not technical format — determines regulatory treatment. This means issuers must independently assess compliance in every jurisdiction where they distribute tokens, increasing legal overhead for multi-chain, multi-geography products.

Summary

Tokenized treasuries use smart contracts to distribute T-bill yield automatically to holders. Platforms like RWA.xyz and DeFiLlama track TVL by multiplying token supply by oracle prices or issuer NAV. Leading products such as BlackRock BUIDL and Circle USYC restrict access to qualified purchasers or non-US institutions.

The market cap crossed $11.92 billion as of 18 March 2026, up from $100 million in Q1 2023. Ethereum holds 57% of RWA TVL, followed by BNB Chain, Stellar, and Solana. Use cases span DeFi collateral on Aave Horizon, DAO treasury allocation, and institutional cash management with 24/7 settlement.

Conclusion

Readers now understand tokenized treasuries as 1:1 claims on US government bonds managed through smart contracts. They distinguish TVL calculation methods, compare protocols by access and yield, and identify risks such as custodian failure and KYC whitelisting. Regulatory frameworks apply existing securities laws across jurisdictions.

Multi-chain deployment expands reach but fragments liquidity. Live trackers provide the most current data.

Why You Might Be Interested?

Tokenized treasuries enable DAOs to earn T-bill yield on idle reserves and institutions to settle Treasury positions 24/7. DeFi users access productive collateral on Aave or Morpho Blue.

On-chain treasury market cap exceeded $11 billion as of March 2026, dominating tokenized RWA assets.

Quick Stats

  • Tokenized treasury market cap: $11.92 billion (as of 18 March 2026)
  • Ethereum RWA TVL share: ~57% (as of 17 March 2026)
  • BUIDL TVL: ~$2.4 billion (as of March 2026)
  • USYC TVL: ~$2.3 billion (as of March 2026)
  • BENJI TVL: ~$780 million (as of March 2026)
  • Solana RWA market cap: $1.71 billion (as of late February 2026)
  • Stellar BENJI AUM share: 63% (as of early 2026)

Data current as of March 2026.

FAQ

? Why do RWA.xyz and DeFiLlama sometimes report different TVL figures?

RWA.xyz focuses on distributed assets that transfer freely on-chain, while DeFiLlama includes represented assets with internal recordkeeping. DeFiLlama uses oracle prices for liquid tokens and issuer NAV for others. Stale NAV data can cause discrepancies between platforms.

? Which tokenized treasury product offers the broadest investor access?

Ondo Finance USDY targets non-US non-accredited investors through a structured note framework. BENJI accepts accredited investors via the Benji app. BUIDL limits access to qualified purchasers with $5 million minimum investments.

? How does KYC whitelisting affect token portability across products?

KYC whitelisting restricts transfers to verified wallets on a per-issuer basis. Holders must repeat KYC for each issuer's product. This limits interoperability between BUIDL, USYC, and OUSG despite shared blockchains.

? What happens if a custodian holding the underlying bonds fails?

Token holders rely on the custodian's solvency for bond redemption. Segregated custody protects assets from issuer bankruptcy but not custodian failure. IOSCO highlights this as a distinct risk in tokenized products.

? Can retail investors outside the US buy tokenized treasuries?

USDY permits non-US retail access without accredited status. USYC requires $100,000 minimum for non-US institutions. EU MiCA allows retail access depending on product classification.

? How often do TVL trackers update their data?

RWA.xyz updates daily for distributed assets using oracle NAV. DeFiLlama refreshes oracle-based TVL continuously but relies on weekly issuer reports for NAV products. Check platform timestamps for latest figures.

References / Sources

Official Protocol & Issuer Documentation

Primary documentation from issuers, fund prospectuses, and official product pages.

  • BlackRock: BUIDL Fund Prospectus and product announcements (blackrock.com)
  • Franklin Templeton: BENJI / FOBXX Investor Documentation (franklintempleton.com)
  • Ondo Finance: USDY and OUSG Product Documentation (ondo.finance)
  • Circle: USYC Investor Onboarding and product terms (circle.com)
  • Superstate: USTB product documentation (superstate.co)
  • VanEck: VBILL fund documentation and Aave Horizon integration announcement
On-Chain Data & Analytics Platforms

Live and historical TVL, market cap, and chain distribution data sources.

  • RWA.xyz: Tokenized U.S. Treasuries Analytics and historical TVL data (rwa.xyz)
  • DeFiLlama: RWA Category Methodology and TVL tracking (defillama.com)
  • CoinPaprika: Tokenized Treasury Market Data (coinpaprika.com)
  • RWA.io: Tokenized T-Bills Yield Rates and Risks overview (rwa.io)
Regulatory & Institutional Reports

Official regulatory statements, industry body publications, and institutional research on tokenized securities.

  • SEC: Joint Statement on Tokenized Securities, 28 January 2026 (sec.gov)
  • IOSCO: Tokenization of Financial Assets Report, 2025
  • Federal Reserve Bank of New York: Secondary Market Development for Tokenized Fund Shares, September 2025
  • MAS: Revised Guide on Tokenisation of Financial Assets, December 2025 (mas.gov.sg)
  • DTCC: Canton Network Treasury Tokenization Announcement, December 2025 (dtcc.com)
  • Broadridge: Next-Gen Markets — The Rise and Reality of Tokenization (broadridge.com)
Industry Analysis & Market Commentary

Third-party analysis, exchange research, and educational content on tokenized treasury market developments.

  • KuCoin Blog: How to Buy Tokenized Treasuries (kucoin.com)
  • ChainUp: Tokenization 2026 Rewires Business Models (chainup.com)
  • INX: Tokenized Treasuries — The Safest Way to Earn Yield On-Chain in 2025 (inx.co)
  • Antier Solutions: Tokenized Treasuries Explained — Features That Make or Break Platforms in 2025 (antiersolutions.com)
  • BingX Learn: What is Ondo Finance — Tokenized RWA Protocol (bingx.com)

Related articles

Latest articles

Coinpaprika education

Discover practical guides, definitions, and deep dives to grow your crypto knowledge.

Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and involve significant risk. You may lose part or all of your investment.

All information on Coinpaprika is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Coinpaprika is not liable for any losses resulting from the use of this information.

Go back to Education